<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truth and Truthiness&#8230; isn&#8217;t Obama ahead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/</link>
	<description>Living the optimized work week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Four Hour Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>The Four Hour Trial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Delegates vs Vote Count Addressed in main stream media:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080131/ts_nm/usa_politics_delegates_dc_2

BTW, it has nothing to do with the 4HWW, but people should be able to chat on their own blog about whatever they want.  That doesn&#039;t mean the main focus is gone, but if you have something to say, say it.

-M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delegates vs Vote Count Addressed in main stream media:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080131/ts_nm/usa_politics_delegates_dc_2" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080131/ts_nm/usa_politics_delegates_dc_2</a></p>
<p>BTW, it has nothing to do with the 4HWW, but people should be able to chat on their own blog about whatever they want.  That doesn&#8217;t mean the main focus is gone, but if you have something to say, say it.</p>
<p>-M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rexreed</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>rexreed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Good point! I need to get back to the focus and topic at hand. I&#039;ve been distracted lately, but no longer.... stay tuned. I have more to say on the subject!

Rex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point! I need to get back to the focus and topic at hand. I&#8217;ve been distracted lately, but no longer&#8230;. stay tuned. I have more to say on the subject!</p>
<p>Rex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ferriss Impersonator</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ferriss Impersonator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>How does any of this have to do with the 4HWW?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does any of this have to do with the 4HWW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Four Hour Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>The Four Hour Trial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>BTW, I just looked at the image you have posted again, and it is not indicative of the NV-ONLY results!  To be fair, it does say &quot;Up to...&quot;.  However, to be clear, the following I present for NV specific results:

Clinton 5,355 51% 12 
Obama 4,773 45% 13 

From this, we can see that Obama got 13 delegates with only 45% of popular vote to Clinton&#039;s 12 delegates with 51% of the vote.  My goodness, can you believe only 10k people in NV voted in the Democratic Caucus?  :-)  WOW!  The media should have just let it slide as a non-event.  Oh, wait...it&#039;s a Republican State!  Romney knows that! He received 2.5x as many votes as these candidates combined.

-M

(source:  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21660914)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I just looked at the image you have posted again, and it is not indicative of the NV-ONLY results!  To be fair, it does say &#8220;Up to&#8230;&#8221;.  However, to be clear, the following I present for NV specific results:</p>
<p>Clinton 5,355 51% 12<br />
Obama 4,773 45% 13 </p>
<p>From this, we can see that Obama got 13 delegates with only 45% of popular vote to Clinton&#8217;s 12 delegates with 51% of the vote.  My goodness, can you believe only 10k people in NV voted in the Democratic Caucus?  <img src='http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   WOW!  The media should have just let it slide as a non-event.  Oh, wait&#8230;it&#8217;s a Republican State!  Romney knows that! He received 2.5x as many votes as these candidates combined.</p>
<p>-M</p>
<p>(source:  <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21660914" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21660914</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Four Hour Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>The Four Hour Trial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweekdiary.com/2008/01/26/truth-and-truthiness-isnt-obama-ahead/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Interesting article because I had the same exact thoughts on this!  Certainly, the media will generally report on popular votes.  But I&#039;m absolutely shocked that the media didn&#039;t report on the fact that Obama really did win NV!  It actually would have been a good article for them.  If I remember correctly (and I may not), I thought that NV and FL were the last two (maybe two of three) states to announce results in Bush/Gore.  Is that accurate?  Surely a dangling chad or parallelism analogy could have sparked some interest.  

My money says that the Democratic candidate selection will be VERY close - similar to the presidential race of &#039;04.  It may even boil down to the same outcome:  Delegates outweigh popular votes.  Either way, I&#039;m about 99.99999999% confident we see a D become the next President which means history is going to be made with either a female or a black male as President.  With Obama just gaining the sponsorship of Camelot, I think he has a really good chance.  I only hope that neither will face the same destiny - which is a very real, yet equally ignored and unreported possibility. (note:  I don&#039;t watch much news, but do read quite a bit and haven&#039;t seen mention of anything I&#039;ve stated above - so if it is widely reported them I&#039;m simply among the ignorant many).

-M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article because I had the same exact thoughts on this!  Certainly, the media will generally report on popular votes.  But I&#8217;m absolutely shocked that the media didn&#8217;t report on the fact that Obama really did win NV!  It actually would have been a good article for them.  If I remember correctly (and I may not), I thought that NV and FL were the last two (maybe two of three) states to announce results in Bush/Gore.  Is that accurate?  Surely a dangling chad or parallelism analogy could have sparked some interest.  </p>
<p>My money says that the Democratic candidate selection will be VERY close &#8211; similar to the presidential race of &#8217;04.  It may even boil down to the same outcome:  Delegates outweigh popular votes.  Either way, I&#8217;m about 99.99999999% confident we see a D become the next President which means history is going to be made with either a female or a black male as President.  With Obama just gaining the sponsorship of Camelot, I think he has a really good chance.  I only hope that neither will face the same destiny &#8211; which is a very real, yet equally ignored and unreported possibility. (note:  I don&#8217;t watch much news, but do read quite a bit and haven&#8217;t seen mention of anything I&#8217;ve stated above &#8211; so if it is widely reported them I&#8217;m simply among the ignorant many).</p>
<p>-M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

